slu-pp-915 Buyer Guide: Capsule Prices, Lab Solid, and COA Checks

Short answer: compare identity, format, and active content

The slu-pp-915 buying question starts with exact chemical identity, format, and how much active material the package contains. Compare slu-pp-915 offers by documented active content and finished-product evidence, then use PeptidePub to check vendor standards and current deals.

SLU-PP-915 is a synthetic small-molecule pan-ERR agonist, not a peptide. Being sold alongside peptides does not change its chemistry. This guide compares actual capsule and laboratory-solid listings, with prices observed November 2, 2026.

Start by separating three questions: what compound is listed, what amount is supported, and what the order actually costs. A low price per labeled milligram answers only part of that checklist.

For the endurance comparison, read SLU-PP-915 versus MOTS-c. Here, the focus is purchase evaluation: capsule label arithmetic, solid pricing, bulk tiers, and the evidence behind each format. Use our vendor directory and methodology for the broader evaluation framework. Neither seller below was independently batch-authenticated for this guide.

What the original research actually shows

Hampton and colleagues identified SLU-PP-915 as compound 10s, a boronic-acid-containing thiophene, in European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry in 2023, volume 258, article 115582 (PMID 37421886). They reported direct ERR-gamma binding and ERR target-gene induction in vitro and in vivo. Do not substitute findings for SLU-PP-332 simply because the names look similar.

ERR alpha, beta, and gamma regulate genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis, oxidative phosphorylation, fatty-acid oxidation, and the Krebs cycle. Researchers also measured Ddit4 and mitochondrial gene-expression responses.

Billon and colleagues reported oral bioavailability and improved treadmill distance and duration in mice in the January 2026 Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, 393(1):103787 (PMID 41421047), published online December 1, 2025. Comparable efficacy followed exposure adjustment, not equal milligram doses.

That supports interest in the compound's metabolic research, not a human fat-loss percentage, an exercise replacement, or a human regimen. No controlled human outcome trial was identified in the research supplied for this guide. Study findings also do not authenticate retail material.

The 2026 paper discloses Saint Louis University intellectual property with Thomas P. Burris as inventor and stockholder in Myonid Therapeutics and Pelagos Pharmaceuticals. Keep those disclosures alongside the findings when weighing the evidence.

Capsule and laboratory-solid prices

These are displayed USD prices observed November 2, 2026, not checkout-verified totals. Compare the labeled active amount, not the weight of a whole capsule.

• Disguised Alpha capsules: 10 mg per capsule, 60 capsules, 600 labeled mg per bottle. Displayed price: $139.99. Calculation: $139.99 / 600 = $0.2333167 per labeled mg, or $0.23 rounded. The page identifies purchasing batch SLP901 and claims 99%+ HPLC purity and 8x verified batches. Those are seller claims, not PeptidePub authentication.

• Probechem PC-20982 solid, 5 mg: $248, or $49.60/mg.

• Probechem solid, 10 mg: $398, or $39.80/mg.

• Probechem solid, 25 mg: $598, or $23.92/mg.

Probechem displayed all three priced sizes as in stock. Its 50 mg and 100 mg options required a quote, with no verified price. The seller states purity above 98% HPLC; a matching batch report was not authenticated.

The spread is striking, but it does not establish equivalent material, testing, formulation, or supplier quality. Capsules contain excipients. Their labeled active content needs different proof from a laboratory solid's stated mass.

These are two observed supplier examples, not a market-wide range or a cheapest-vendor award. Treat the arithmetic as a way to ask better questions, then compare documentation before deciding which offer fits.

Bulk tiers: lower unit prices, separate quantity decisions

Disguised Alpha displayed these per-bottle quantity tiers on November 2, 2026. Each bottle carries 600 labeled active mg:

• 3-4 bottles: $132.99 each / 600 = $0.22165 per labeled mg, about $0.22.

• 5-9 bottles: $125.99 each / 600 = $0.20998 per labeled mg, about $0.21.

• 10-19 bottles: $118.99 each / 600 = $0.19832 per labeled mg, about $0.20.

• 20+ bottles: $111.99 each / 600 = $0.18665 per labeled mg, about $0.19.

These are quantity tiers, not coupon codes or a reason to purchase more than you need. A lower unit price can still mean a larger total spend. For the actual comparison, use: Delivered cost per labeled mg = (eligible discounted subtotal + shipping + unavoidable fees + applicable tax) / total labeled active mg.

Do not divide by capsule weight or mistake 10 mg per capsule for the bottle total. Use independently measured content instead only when a matching quantitative report supports it.

Shipping, tax, payment fees, geographic eligibility, coupon stacking, final checkout, and fulfillment were not verified. Neither seller has a verified PeptidePub discount in this guide. Check prices and deals for tracked products and current eligible offers. The cost-per-dose tool illustrates arithmetic for supported compounds; it has no populated SLU-PP-915 comparison or validated dose.

COA checklist: match the exact compound and shipping lot

Start with identity. Probechem lists CAS 2285432-92-8, formula C17H13BFNO3S, and molecular weight 341.16 g/mol for SLU-PP-915. Disguised Alpha's reference guide rounds that weight to 341.2. Different precision is not a different compound, but SLU-PP-332 is a different name that should not pass unnoticed.

Request the shipping lot, sample identity, report date, appropriate small-molecule identity testing, quantitative active-content assay, and relevant contaminant results. Verify the report with its laboratory rather than relying on a screenshot.

For capsules, ask whether testing covers the finished formulation. A raw-powder COA does not establish the amount in each capsule or capsule-to-capsule consistency. Chromatographic purity alone answers neither question.

Disguised Alpha describes lot reports, but no report for SLP901 or laboratory independence was authenticated for this guide. Probechem shows a Select Batch interface, but no matching report was authenticated there either. Neither is labeled third-party verified by PeptidePub here.

Probechem also reports supplier assay EC50 values of 414/435/378 nM for ERR alpha/beta/gamma. These are assay values, not human doses or clinical potency, and results depend on assay format.

Use our COA reading guide and lab-vetting checklist to organize the evidence request. A useful report should answer the specific question your price comparison assumes.

Match the format to the research question

Capsules and laboratory solid are not interchangeable analytical materials just because both listings say SLU-PP-915. The best-value format is the one with documentation and physical properties that fit the intended research, not automatically the lowest displayed price per mg.

For capsules, request the excipient list, finished-formulation identity testing, quantitative active content, and information on formulation stability. Confirm what was sampled: starting powder, a pooled capsule sample, or individual finished units. Those are different evidence questions.

For solid, ask about assay compatibility, solvent and method requirements, storage, and the material covered by the report. Probechem lists 10 mM DMSO solubility. That is a laboratory property, not an administration or reconstitution instruction.

Keep those format questions separate from the mouse study. Oral exposure in an experimental formulation does not validate the formulation, composition, or performance of a retail capsule.

PeptidePub does not currently have a standalone SLU-PP-915 catalog guide or price-comparison page. Use the existing comparison article for compound context and the vendor resources for purchasing standards. Do not assume a compound is tracked simply because an editorial guide discusses it.

FAQ: four questions before buying slu-pp-915

Is SLU-PP-915 a peptide?

No. It is a synthetic small-molecule pan-ERR agonist. A seller's category label or a discussion in a peptide community does not determine chemical identity. Match the exact name and identity evidence rather than treating similar product placement as proof of similar composition.

How much does SLU-PP-915 cost?

The November 2, 2026 examples were $139.99 for 60 capsules labeled 10 mg each at Disguised Alpha, and $248/5 mg, $398/10 mg, or $598/25 mg for Probechem solid. Delivery costs were not verified. These examples are not a comprehensive market range.

The capsule bottle's 600 mg total is label arithmetic: 10 times 60. It is not chemically verified content. The $0.23 rounded unit price describes the label claim and displayed bottle price, not an independently measured quantity or a promise about the final checkout total.

When comparing a different listing, write down the format, units per package, active amount per unit, and subtotal before calculating. That prevents a bottle-versus-capsule mistake from making an offer look better or worse than it is.

Is a 600 mg capsule bottle equivalent to 600 mg of laboratory solid?

That equivalence has not been established. Check quantitative active-content testing, excipients, formulation, and exact-lot documentation. A shared label total does not prove equal suitability for a particular analysis. Nor does a high HPLC purity claim establish how much active material is inside a finished capsule.

Keep the denominators honest: labeled active mg for a label-based comparison, or independently measured active mg when matching evidence supports it. Do not silently switch between those standards across vendors.

Does oral activity in mice prove a human benefit or dosage?

No. The 2026 study reported oral exposure and treadmill effects in mice. No controlled human outcome trial was identified in the supplied research. Exposure-adjusted experimental efficacy is not an equal-milligram comparison or a consumer protocol.

The practical buyer takeaway is to separate three evidence levels: research on the compound, analytical evidence for the supplied material, and evidence for a human outcome. A paper answers the first kind of question. An exact-lot laboratory report can address the second. Neither automatically establishes the third, and a retailer's reference guide does not bridge that gap.

Bottom line: compare documented content, then final price

Shortlist the exact format, request the matching report, and calculate delivered cost using the active-content denominator your evidence supports. Then compare the offers that actually meet your requirements.

The capsule example offers a much lower price per labeled mg than the listed laboratory solids. That is useful arithmetic, not proof that the products are equivalent or that one supplier is better. The stronger purchase decision combines a clear label, relevant finished-product testing, a verifiable lot, and a final payable total.

Keep a copy of the listing and matching report with the purchase. If the quoted lot changes before shipment, confirm the replacement documentation rather than carrying the old report forward.

Make PeptidePub the check before checkout: review vendor standards, compare tracked peptide prices, and check current deals. SLU-PP-915 itself is not currently tracked in our catalog, but the buying habit still applies: know what is in the package, know what the evidence supports, and know what you will pay.